theatlantic: What Happens When We Turn the World’s Most Famous Robot Test on Ourselves? This weekend marks the centenary of Alan Turing’s birth. Turing was one of the greatest computer scientist of all time. In a 1950 paper that outlined what has come to be known as the Turing Test he offered a way out of endless philosophical speculation about whether computers could ever be classed as ‘intelligent.’ He said that if human judges ask interview questions of a hidden computer and a hidden person and cannot tell the difference after five minutes, the computer should be considered intelligent. Nowadays, programmers compete yearly for the Loebner Prize, which is won by the computer that is most often mistaken for a human.  But the Turing Test’s application is no longer limited to questions of artificial intelligence: Social scientists too are getting in on the action and using the test in a completely new way — to compare different human subjects and their ability to pass as members of groups to which they do not belong, such as religious and ethnic minorities or particular professional classes. With the Turing Test, sociologists can compare the extent to which subjects can understand people who are different from them in some way. Read more. [Image: Anton Zabielskyi/Shutterstock/Rebecca J. Rosen]
Pop-upView Separately

theatlantic:

What Happens When We Turn the World’s Most Famous Robot Test on Ourselves?

This weekend marks the centenary of Alan Turing’s birth. Turing was one of the greatest computer scientist of all time. In a 1950 paper that outlined what has come to be known as the Turing Test he offered a way out of endless philosophical speculation about whether computers could ever be classed as ‘intelligent.’ He said that if human judges ask interview questions of a hidden computer and a hidden person and cannot tell the difference after five minutes, the computer should be considered intelligent. Nowadays, programmers compete yearly for the Loebner Prize, which is won by the computer that is most often mistaken for a human. 

But the Turing Test’s application is no longer limited to questions of artificial intelligence: Social scientists too are getting in on the action and using the test in a completely new way — to compare different human subjects and their ability to pass as members of groups to which they do not belong, such as religious and ethnic minorities or particular professional classes. With the Turing Test, sociologists can compare the extent to which subjects can understand people who are different from them in some way.

Read more. [Image: Anton Zabielskyi/Shutterstock/Rebecca J. Rosen]

115 Notes/ Hide

  1. primuscapio reblogged this from theatlantic
  2. coffee-coma reblogged this from theatlantic
  3. sinfulsolace reblogged this from theatlantic
  4. inkflowers reblogged this from theatlantic
  5. erzi reblogged this from techerous
  6. techerous reblogged this from michpalmer
  7. michpalmer reblogged this from theatlantic
  8. urmonotheismus reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. fyeahnextsmalane reblogged this from cab1729
  10. zeroeightfour reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. effloreo reblogged this from theatlantic
  12. mediasphere reblogged this from theatlantic
  13. therwreader reblogged this from theatlantic
  14. gwilliam reblogged this from thetinhouse
  15. thebitterhour reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. weejit reblogged this from theatlantic
  17. myknowledgebase reblogged this from theatlantic
  18. blakechastain reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Fascinating article about interactional expertise and the Turing Test. Applying the Turing Test to people reveals how...
  19. attheimaginarium reblogged this from theatlantic
  20. catedrals reblogged this from theatlantic
  21. cavalierzee reblogged this from theatlantic